<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01096nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533936</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533936</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260723b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gowri, Kolluru and  Shylajan, C.S.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">62015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Taxing gig worker incomes in India: Issues and policy challenges</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political  Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(28), Jul 11, 2026: p.26-32</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The expansion of the gig economy has created taxation and compliance challenges due to blurred distinctions between employment and self-employment. Existing provisions such as Sections 194O, 194M, and 44ADA remain poorly aligned with platform-based work, leading to compliance burdens, inconsistent tax treatment, and limited social protection. Recent policy discussions, including those by NITI Aayog, have proposed simplified filing and clearer worker classification. The article argues for a coherent, worker-centric tax framework integrating fiscal and labour policy.-Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/28/perspectives/taxing-gig-worker-incomes-india.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political  Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">409128</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-07-23</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(28), Jul 11, 2026: p.26-32</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR139383</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-07-23</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
