<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Taxing gig worker incomes in India: Issues and policy challenges</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Gowri, Kolluru and  Shylajan, C.S.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Economic &amp; Political  Weekly</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>61(28), Jul 11, 2026: p.26-32</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The expansion of the gig economy has created taxation and compliance challenges due to blurred distinctions between employment and self-employment. Existing provisions such as Sections 194O, 194M, and 44ADA remain poorly aligned with platform-based work, leading to compliance burdens, inconsistent tax treatment, and limited social protection. Recent policy discussions, including those by NITI Aayog, have proposed simplified filing and clearer worker classification. The article argues for a coherent, worker-centric tax framework integrating fiscal and labour policy.-Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/28/perspectives/taxing-gig-worker-incomes-india.html
</abstract>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Economic &amp; Political  Weekly </namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">260723</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
