<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Parliamentary oversight of subordinate legislation: Balancing efficiency and accountability</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Singh, N.K.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">The Journal parliamentary Information</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>71(3), Sep, 2025: p.420-435</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Theoretically speaking laws are made by legislature, government executes and judiciary interprets them. It many sound strange though; this is not the case always in actuarial practice. The operational dynamics of parliamentary system of governance is such that laws are not made by legislature alone. These are prepared in draft form by the administrative ministers, to be discussed and approved by the legislature. – Reproduced </abstract>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>The Journal parliamentary Information </namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">260728</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
