01471pab a2200145 454500008004000000100001800040245007400058260000900132300001300141362000800154520108000162650003301242650001701275773003301292180718b2002   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aGould, Jon B.  aPlaying with fire: the civil liberties implications of September 11th  c2002  ap.74-79.  aSep  aThe aftermath of September 11th has seen a worrisome rise in invasive surveillance measures.  Both adopted by statute and initiated by agencies, these provisions provide unprecedented powers for government agents to investigatge suspects and search individuals, whether they are directly involved in terrorism or not.  The prevailing wisdom has been that the American people will accept these restrictions as the natural cost of heightened security, and initial evidence suggests the public has been willing to tolerate greater limits on civil liberties.  However, over time such support will erode, leaving in place permanent restrictions on civil liberties that not only will concern Americans, but also may turn them against government officials and civic participation.  Thus, contrary to many interpretations of September 11th, this article argues that the policy response has only sown the seeds for greater detachment from and dissatisfaction with government as the public becomes increasingly separated from the workings and operations of public policy. - Reproduced.  aHuman rights - United States  aHuman rights  aPublic Administration Review