01311pab a2200157 454500008004000000100001800040245012000058260000900178300001400187362001100201520081800212650002301030650003701053650002901090773003401119180718b2003   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aSingh, Jaivir  aIncentives and judicially determined terms of employment in India: endemic trade-off between justice and efficiency  c2003  ap.124-34.  a11 Jan  aThis paper begins by presenting an account of some of the successive restrictions imposed by the law - both by the statutes and their interpretation by courts - that define the parameters within which Indian industrial establishments are obliged to function in relation to dismissing workers.  This description of the substantive content of the law indicates that the restrictions on the termination of errant workers are embedded in judicial concerns of equality.  Translated into procedure this requires, one, that penalties imposed on workers be proportional to misconduct, and two, that stringent evidentiary requirements by met in every case of worker termination.  These constraints lead to a trade-off is inevitable or it is possible to ease the trade-off by structurally reorienting the law. - Reproduced.  aEmployment - India  aConditions of employment - India  aConditions of employment  aEconomic and Political Weekly