Decentralisation in Zimbabwe: a local perspective
- 2003
- p.115-24.
- 1 Feb
Although decentralisation has been on the Government of Zimbabwe's agenda since the early 1980s and there have been several structural reforms, little effective power has been decentralised. This article describes Zimbabwe's various decentralisation efforts and effects including fiscal decentralisation, sectoral decentralisation, local political and institutional structures and local economic development and poverty reduction, and analyses their impact in Binga District, which is one of the poorest parts of the country. A number of conclusions are drawn from this experience. Firstly, decentralisation is part of a wider process of national political and economic change and cannot be planned independently; moreover, decentralisation for the `wrong' reasons can be worse than no decentralisation at all and, if the political environment is not `right', the problems of decentralisation can be exacerbated by external funding agencies. secondly, decentralisation must be accompanied by capacity building, and the capacity of local institutions depends to a significant extent on the individuals involved. Thirdly, decentralisation must be seen as a `learning process'; consequently, despite the relatively little effective decentralisation to date, those involved have learnt valuable lessons. - Reproduced.