01676pab a2200169 454500008004000000100002500040245004800065260000900113300001600122362001000138520117100148650002101319773003401340909001001374999001701384952010501401180718b2003   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aFernandes, Aureliano  aAggrandiser government and local governance  c2003  ap.2873-879.  a5 Jul  a`Aggrandiser government', in most states, continues to hold on to most powers, even as they have been formally devolved to local government through conformity legislations. Deficiencies in facilitating the potential of panchayati raj persist at three levels - state, panchayati raj institutions and societal levels. Big government at the state level with a patrimonial perception of self and aggrandiser instincts have pushed the `self-governance participatory model' of the panchayats to the periphery, both at the level of discourse and praxis. This coupled with conceptual inadequacies, epistemic and operational constraints, poor finances, and political interference have posed a serious challenge to the realisation of the potential role envisaged for panchayats in the 73rd Amendment. If panchayati raj has to fulfill its foundational tenets of empowering the community there is need to recognise the primacy of societal good over individual or political goals. PRIs have to transform themselves into community institutions fulfilling a social contract with an all inclusive participatory planning and associationalism as essential methodologies. - Reproduced.  aLocal government  aEconomic and Political Weekly  a57207  c57207d57207  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 38, Issue no: 27pAR57652r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR