<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01806pab a2200169 454500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="008">180718b2003   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Baviskar, Amita</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Between violence and desire: space, power, and identity in the making of metropolitan Delhi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2003</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">p.89-98.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="362" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mar</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">State-making is a process of creating subjects and places, in order to produce and perpetuate relations of power that facilitate projects of rule. Viewing development as a particular form of state-making, scholars and activists have high-lighted the coercive and often traumatic nature of the displacement that development induces. This paper suggests that the power of the development discourse stems not only from its repressive apparatus, but also from the multiple ways in which it is able to address the desires of different social groups for better lives. Violence and desire are fused together in the practices of development and displacement. This argument is made ethnographically, through an analysis of the conflicts around planned urban development and environmental improvement in Delhi, the capital of India. This paper describes the making and unmaking of Delhi as a "clean and green" city, and the powerful contestations around the making of urban place and personhood. It examines state attempts to control and restructure urban space and argues that, through strategies of compromise as well as resistance, working class struggles to secure housing and employment reconstitute the relationship between environment and development that urban planners and the bourgeoisie seek to impose. - Reproduced.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Urban development - India - Delhi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Urban development</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">International Social Science Journal</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">57431</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">57431</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">57431</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">Volume no: 175, </subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR57876</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
