<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>From bureaucracy to humanocracy: Role of leadership</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Golandaz, Hafiza</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xu|</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued>2005</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">ng </languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>p.199-215.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The article defines bureau-neurosis as the degenerated form of bureaucracy which fails to provide individuals with harmony at work place, autonomy and participation in decision-making, informalness in relationships and above trust in organisation. This negation of fundamental emotional needs - to be understood and to be treated with respect - leads to discord in the organisations. Hence it is in the interest of both the individuals as well as organisations that such bureau-neurosis is not created in the first place. Incorporation of he principles of humanocracy in the working of bureaucracy is, therefore, recommended as a preventive mechanism. - Reproduced.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Leadership</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Bureaucracy</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Indian Journal of Public Administration</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">180718</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
