01340pab a2200205 454500008004000000100001900040245010000059260000900159300001400168362000800182520073500190650001500925650001400940700001900954773002100973908000600994909001001000999001701010952010701027180718b2007   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aBruni, Luigino  aThe road not taken: how psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back  c2007  ap.146-73.  aJan  aThis article explores parallels between the debate prompted by Pareto's reformulation of choice theory at the beginning of the twentieth century and current controversies about the status of behavioural economics. Before Pareto's reformulation, neoclassical economics was based on theoretical and experimental psychology, as behavioural economics now is. Current `discovered preference' defences of rational-choice theory echo arguments made by Pareto. Both treat economics as a separate science of rational choice, independent of psychology. Both confront two fundamental problems: to find a defensible definition of the domain of economics, and to justify the assumption that preferences are consistent and stable. - Reproduced.  aPsychology  aEconomics  aSugden, Robert  aEconomic Journal  aN  a74508  c74508d74508  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 117, Issue no: 516pAR74968r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR