<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Golden age and golden rule in unionized economies</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Vetter, Henrik</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xu|</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued>2007</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">ng </languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>p.100-07.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Golden Age and Golden Rule growth paths exemplify different ways to distribute income. In a recent article. Frank Thompson describes the difference between the two. In particular, the Golden Age is characterized by conflict between capital owners and workers. Despite this, workers act competitively; they are passive, taking whatever wage they are offered. In this extension and reexamination of Thompson's results, we assume that workers organize in a union when there is conflict with capitalists. - Reproduced.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Wages</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Review of Radical Political Economics</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">180718</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
