01465pab a2200181 454500008004000000100002100040245009900061260000900160300001400169362000800183520092200191650001301113773002001126908000601146909001001152999001701162952010401179180718b2007   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aStruening, Karen  aDo government sponsored marriage promotion policies place undue pressure on individual rights?  c2007  ap.241-59.  aSep  aThe dominance of social science research in the debate over the Bush Administration's Healthy Marriage Initiative may explain why questions regarding the proper role of government in regulating adult intimacy have received little attention. Social science research focuses on outcomes such as well-being and health. In contrast, rights-based legal theory considers whether state action undermines the rights of individuals. In this article, I intend to shift the debate over marriage promotion policy from questions of child well-being to questions of individual rights. I will ask the following questions: Do individuals have a liberty interest in making their own choices about intimate relationships, such as marriage? Do federally-financed (and frequently state-run) marriage programs compromise this liberty interest? Are there any constitutional grounds for objecting to marriage promotion policy? - Reproduced.  aMarriage  aPolicy Sciences  aN  a76411  c76411d76411  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 40, Issue no: 3pAR76871r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR