01369pab a2200193 454500008004000000100002100040245005400061260000900115300001200124362000800136520079800144650002600942700001800968773005200986908000601038909001001044999001701054952010401071180718b2008   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aChristensen, Tom  aNPM and beyond - structure culture and demography  c2008  ap.7-23.  aMar  aThe main research questions in this article are to what degree New Public Management (NPM) and post-NPM) reform elements have been perceived as relevant or significant in the Norwegian civil service; what have been the most significant reform elements; and how to explain to variation in the perceived significance to other structural factors and to demographic and cultural features? The empirical data used in the analysis are taken mainly from surveys of civil servants in the Norwegian ministries conducted in 1996 and 2006. A general finding is that cultural features make a significant difference, but have a leadership position and task structure also have explanatory power. Generally, we face a combination of robustness and amenability to administrative policy reforms. - Reproduced.  aPublic administration  aLaegreid, Per  aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences  aN  a77855  c77855d77855  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 74, Issue no: 1pAR78315r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR