01556pab a2200193 454500008004000000100001700040245006700057260000900124300001400133362000800147520098200155650002601137700001701163773004501180908000601225909001001231999001701241952010401258180718b2008   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aAlford, John  aPublic value pragmatism as the next phase of public management  c2008  ap.130-48.  aJul  aNew Public Management has now been "bew" for more than 15 years, and public administration scholars are calling for new approaches, such as networked governance or collaboration. However, these approaches share with their predecessors the problem that they tend toward a one-best-way orientation. Instead, the authors argue, the next phase should be what they call "public value pragmatism". In other words, the best management approach to adopt depends on the circumstances, such as the value being produced, the context, or the nature of the task. They illustrate a decision framework for determining the most appropriate approach for different types of circumstances. The emerging literature also tends to be unclear about the level of the public sector to which it applies. The authors distinguish three levels - programs, organizations, and whole public sectors - and put forward some propositions about how public value pragmatism might apply at each level. - Reproduced.  aPublic administration  aHughes, Owen  aAmerican Review of Public Administration  aN  a78999  c78999d78999  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 38, Issue no: 2pAR79459r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR