01599pab a2200217 454500008004000000100002200040245007300062260000900135300001600144362000800160520095800168650002001126650002201146650001401168700002701182773003401209908000601243909001001249999001701259952010501276180718b2009   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aKalandadze, Katya  aElectoral protests and democratization: beyond the color revolutions  c2009  ap.1403-425.  aNov  aThe sight of thousands of people demonstrating for clean elections and an end to corrupt postcommunist regimes led many observers to declare that the so-called color revolutions had finally brought democracy to Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyztan. But how successful have these electoral revolutions actually been? The authors analyze all cases of electoral revolutions worldwide since 1991, distinguishing between failed and successful electoral revolutions, to conclude that even successful electoral revolutions have shown insignificant or no democratic progress in their wake. Electoral revolutions are ineffective at advancing democratization because they place too great an emphasis on elections themselves and do not address other fundamental obstacles to democratization in hybrid and authoritarian regimes. International influences have proven more successful in promoting democratization in countries of postcommunist Europe. - Reproduced.  aDemocratization  aProtest movements  aElections  aOrenstein, Mitchell A.  aComparative Political Studies  aN  a85172  c85172d85172  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 42, Issue no: 11pAR85632r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR