<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Training and productivity: evidence for US manufacturing industries</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Sepulveda, Facundo</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xu|</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued>2010</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">ng </languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>p.504-28.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>We use a panel of two digit manufacturing industries to examine the role of formal training programs in productivity growth and wage growth. We find evidence for positive and decreasing effects of on-the-job training (OJT) in human capital accumulation, and therefore productivity. We find however weak evidence that OJT affects wage growth, suggesting that the firm appropriates most of the benefits from OJT programs. Off-the job training on the other hand has no effects on industrial productivity or wages. - Reproduced.</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Manufacturing industry</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>United States - Manufacturing industries</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Training - united States</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Training</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Oxford Economic Papers</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">180718</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
