01495pab a2200193 454500 180718b2012 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d Feeney, Mary K. Realized publicness at public and private research universities 2012 p.272-284. Mar - Apr Although research-extensive universities in the United States produce similar outcomes-research, teaching, and service-they vary substantially in terms of the publicness of their environments. In this article, the authors adopt a public values framework to examine how regulative, normative/associative, and cultural cognitive components affect realized public outcomes by faculty. Using survey data from a random sample of faculty scientists in six fields of science and engineering at Carnegie Research I universities, findings show that organizational and individual public values components are associated predictably with different realized individual public outcomes. For example, individual support from federal resources and affiliation with a federal lab (associative) are related to increased research outcomes, while tuition and fee levels (regulative) explain teaching outcomes, and perceived level of influence in the workplace (cultural cognitive) explains teaching and service outcomes. - Reproduced. Universities Research Welch, Eric W. Public Administration Review N 96257 96257 96257 0 0 0 0 IIPA IIPA 2018-07-19 Volume no: 72, Issue no: 2 AR96717 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 AR