01571pab a2200193 454500008004000000100002400040245006000064260000900124300001500133362000800148520100800156650002101164650002601185773002901211908000601240909001001246999001701256952010401273180718b2012   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aTorsteinsen, Harald  aWhy does post - bureaucracy lead to more formalisation?  c2012  ap.321-344.  aJun  aThis paper discusses and tries to explain the paradoxical observation that a local government reform aimed at reducing or even removing bureaucracy actually leads to more formalisation, not less. During the last 10ﾖ15 years more than 40 per cent of Norwegian municipalities have adopted an organisational model that makes the administration more disaggregated, decentralised and flat. The reform has been promoted by strong post- or even anti-bureaucratic rhetoric, arguing for increased managerial autonomy at the operational level. The basic idea is that greater autonomy will create better performance. The paradox of increased formalisation is discussed on the basis of rhetoric, unintended consequences, diagnostic problems and linguistic problems. The paper concludes by pointing out the need for a more nuanced conception of bureaucracy than the dichotomous approach of post-bureaucracy can offer. It also outlines a couple of supplementing explanations for increased formalisation. - Reproduce  aLocal government  aAdministrative reform  aLocal Government Studies  aN  a96944  c96944d96944  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 38, Issue no: 3pAR97404r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR