01518pab a2200181 454500 180718b2013 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d Calista, Donald J. Digitized government among countries worldwide from 2003 to 2010. Performance discrepancies explained by comparing frameworks 2013 p.227-234. Feb Public sector researchers largely portray digitized government as following a maturational movement that will ultimately sustain electronic democracy. An alternate view maintains that digitized government reflects broader public policies that drift and change over time; as a result, it embraces two discrete curvilinear processes-e-government and e-governance. This study compares these differing frameworks by employing successive evaluations published by theUnited Nations of member Web sites from 2003 to 2010. Partitioning appears in the findings. Countries worldwide are pushing the aggregate means higher for digitized government. Yet, disaggregate best practices among early-adopter countries exhibit significantvariability, including in industrialized societies. The findings doubt the maturational view as they bear out the curvilinear construct. The conclusions demonstrate that the potential for an electronic transformation abates before the Great Recession. - Reproduced. E governance Melitski, James International Journal of Public Administration N 99446 99445 99445 0 0 0 0 IIPA IIPA 2018-07-19 Volume no: 36, Issue no: 3 AR99906 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 AR