Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The attorneys’ gender: Exploring counsel success before the U.S. Supreme Court

By: Hack, Jonathan S. and Jenkins, Clinton M.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Political Research Quarterly Description: 75(3), Sep, 2022: p.632-645.Subject(s): Gender and courts, Oral arguments, U.S. Supreme court, Judicial decision-making In: Political Research QuarterlySummary: Stereotypes are powerful heuristics structuring decision-making, with research suggesting that gender-based stereotypes place women at a professional disadvantage. This paper tests whether attorneys’ gender influences Supreme Court outcomes. We construct an attorney-focused data set combining personal and professional attributes with case-level characteristics from 1946 to 2016. Our approach brings clarity to previous findings, enabling a longitudinal analysis of women participation before the Court. We find that attorney gender does not influence party success. In doing so, we show that a more nuanced approach is needed when studying the intersection between judicial outcomes and attorney traits. – Reproduced
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
75(3), Sep, 2022: p.632-645 Available AR127799

Stereotypes are powerful heuristics structuring decision-making, with research suggesting that gender-based stereotypes place women at a professional disadvantage. This paper tests whether attorneys’ gender influences Supreme Court outcomes. We construct an attorney-focused data set combining personal and professional attributes with case-level characteristics from 1946 to 2016. Our approach brings clarity to previous findings, enabling a longitudinal analysis of women participation before the Court. We find that attorney gender does not influence party success. In doing so, we show that a more nuanced approach is needed when studying the intersection between judicial outcomes and attorney traits. – Reproduced

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha