Words matter for government accountability? The linguistic tone of government reports and audit results
By: Park, Sungho
.
Material type: 
BookPublisher: The American Review Public Administration Description: 55(5), Jul, 2025: p.438-455.Subject(s): Accountability, Audit practices, Linguistic tone of government reports, Automated textual analysis
In:
The American Review Public AdministrationSummary: As a critical tool for accountability mechanisms, audits are expected to provide key stakeholders with impartial and unbiased information about government operations. However, meeting this expectation may not be readily achievable since auditors are not entirely free from various bias sources. One such bias source is the linguistic tone of government reports, which auditees can strategically manipulate when needed. To examine the potential existence of such bias in current audit practices, this study employs automated textual analysis of financial reports from all 50 U.S. states spanning fiscal years from 2002 to 2023. The findings reveal a significant relationship between the linguistic tone of financial reports and the discovery of internal control deficiencies, suggesting that auditees’ use of positive and negative words in financial reports is associated with more favorable and unfavorable audit results, respectively. This study contributes to the development of accountable public management practices by enhancing our understanding of the role of audits as effective accountability mechanisms. – Reproduced
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02750740251346809
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 55(5), Jul, 2025: p.438-455 | Available | AR137583 |
As a critical tool for accountability mechanisms, audits are expected to provide key stakeholders with impartial and unbiased information about government operations. However, meeting this expectation may not be readily achievable since auditors are not entirely free from various bias sources. One such bias source is the linguistic tone of government reports, which auditees can strategically manipulate when needed. To examine the potential existence of such bias in current audit practices, this study employs automated textual analysis of financial reports from all 50 U.S. states spanning fiscal years from 2002 to 2023. The findings reveal a significant relationship between the linguistic tone of financial reports and the discovery of internal control deficiencies, suggesting that auditees’ use of positive and negative words in financial reports is associated with more favorable and unfavorable audit results, respectively. This study contributes to the development of accountable public management practices by enhancing our understanding of the role of audits as effective accountability mechanisms. – Reproduced
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02750740251346809
There are no comments for this item.