Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Public-private partnerships in Canada: reflections on twenty years of practice

By: Siemiatycki, Matti.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2015Description: p.343-362.Subject(s): Public private Partnerships - Canada | Public private partnerships In: Canadian Public AdministrationSummary: Across Canada, governments of all level have increasingly embraced public-private partnerships (PPPs) as their preferred approach to deliver large-scale public infrastructure. After twenty years of practice, this paper examines the evolving rationales, governance structures and partnership models that have been used to deliver PPPs in Canada. In particular, the analysis highlights common deal structures, types of risks and responsibilities that are transferred to the private sector, and the significant role that public funding continues to have. Outstanding issues facing Canadian PPPs relate to their high upfront costs, limitations placed on meaningful community consultations, and a procurement process that can inhibit design or architectural excellence. - Reproduced.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
Volume no: 58, Issue no: 3 Available AR109954

Across Canada, governments of all level have increasingly embraced public-private partnerships (PPPs) as their preferred approach to deliver large-scale public infrastructure. After twenty years of practice, this paper examines the evolving rationales, governance structures and partnership models that have been used to deliver PPPs in Canada. In particular, the analysis highlights common deal structures, types of risks and responsibilities that are transferred to the private sector, and the significant role that public funding continues to have. Outstanding issues facing Canadian PPPs relate to their high upfront costs, limitations placed on meaningful community consultations, and a procurement process that can inhibit design or architectural excellence. - Reproduced.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha