000			01588pab a2200181 454500
008			180718b2013 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aAltman, David
245			_aDoes an active use of mechanisms of direct democracy impact electoral participation? Evidence from the U.S. States and the Swiss Cantons
260			_c2013
300			_ap.739-755.
362			_aDec
520			_aThis article investigates the consequences that frequent uses of mechanisms of direct democracy have on electoral turnout, contrasting evidence from the Swiss cantons and states in the United States. It contributes to the existing literature in two senses. First, it constitutes the very first cross-national comparative study on the topic and, therefore, it allows for examination of hypotheses the literature previously advanced for single cases (mostly, but not wholly, confined to the U.S. and Switzerland). Second, in contrast to previous research, it delves into the world of direct democracy and shows that not all MDDs are the same, nor do they have the same political effects in terms of electoral participation. I demonstrate that the previous U.S.- based knowledge does not resist empirical testing when contrasted with Swiss evidence: active use of citizen-driven initiatives have no statistically significant effects on turnout. Nonetheless, voter turnout rates are significantly lower in states and cantons with more top-down measures on the ballot. - Reproduced.
650			_aDemocracy
650			_aElections
773			_aLocal Government Studies
908			_aN
909			_a103423
999			_c103419 _d103419