000			01439pab a2200193 454500
008			180718b2014 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aBoswell, John
245			_aA antipodean history of interpretation
260			_c2014
300			_ap.296-306.
362			_aSep
520			_aIn this paper, we explore the connections between intepretivism's core and its peripheries in both geographical and epistemological terms, by tracing the relationship between interpretivism and Australian political scholarship. In this task, we draw on some of the most celebrated and influential work on Australian politics by political scientists but before them historians and anthropologists to show how the approach typically undertaken by these researchers echoes key tenets of interpretivism, especially through an interest in subjective beliefs and experiences, a desire to uncover and bring to life richly contextualised detail, and a commitment to the abductive linking of theory and practice. As such, we suggest that the spread of this counter identity to interpretive researchers in Australia risks manufacturing a sense of methodological antipathy, marginalising the work of interpretivists from mainstream political scholarship. - Reproduced.
650			_aPolicy making - Australia
650			_aPolicy making
700			_aCorbett, Jack
773			_aAustralian Journal of Public Administration
908			_aN
909			_a105915
999			_c105910 _d105910