| 000 | 01317pab a2200181 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2015 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aTriantafillou, Peter | ||
| 245 | _aThe political implication of performance management and evidence- based policymaking | ||
| 260 | _c2015 | ||
| 300 | _ap.167-181. | ||
| 362 | _aMar | ||
| 520 | _aOver the last few decades performance management (PM) has invaded the public sector in most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. More recently, we have seen increasing demands for evidence-based policymaking (EP). This article critically discusses the political implications of PM and EP by regarding them as particular forms of governing. Accordingly, PM may be viewed as a form of governing hinging on the regulated and accountable forms of freedom exercised by public administrators. In contrast, EP may be regarded as a technocratic and potentially authoritarian form of governing depending on quite narrow and exclusive forms of knowledge production. EP then seems to be directly at odds with PM and sits uneasily with neoliberal forms of rule. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aPerformance appraisal | ||
| 650 | _aPolicy making | ||
| 650 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 773 | _aAmerican Review of Public Administration | ||
| 909 | _a108364 | ||
| 999 |
_c108359 _d108359 |
||