000			01737pab a2200193 454500
008			180718b2015 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aWalters, James
245			_aHousing in a federation: from wicked problem to complexity cascade?
260			_c2015
300			_ap.448-466.
362			_aDec
520			_aThe Commonwealth's periodic attempts at housing and urban policy reform since the 1940s have been made in the face of a federal structure that allocates responsibility for such matters to the states. This paper explores the experience of federal governments since the 1940s, considering the various styles of political leadership, varying ways in which the problem has been framed, and differing policy settings that have been employed in resolving policy challenges. The historical narrative clarifies phases of active engagement and reaction, linking these to fiscal asymmetry and distribution of federal state responsibilities, historical gateway events, and transitions in policy paradigms. We argue that housing is a perpetual concern (both a basic need and an aspirational objective) and is so integrally related to other policy domains in which decisions may have unintended consequences for housing that it is never conclusively resolved. The complexity (and uncertainty) consequent upon these inter -relationships ensures that housing remains a wicked problem. The visual metaphor of a complexity cascade, however, may assist a more nuanced appreciation of the direction of policy travel. - Reproduced.
650			_aFederalism - Australia
650			_aHousing - Australia
650			_aHousing
700			_aHolbrook, Carolyn
773			_aAustralian Journal of Public Administration
909			_a110035
999			_c110030 _d110030