000			01457pab a2200181 454500
008			180718b2016 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHowe, Sarah Withnall
245			_aAnti-corruption watchdog accountability: the limitations of judicial review's ability to guard the guardians
260			_c2016
300			_ap.305-317.
362			_aSep
520			_aAnti-corruption watchdogs form an important part of integrity measures in Australia's system of government. Integrity theory places anti-corruption watchdogs in a fourth branch of government and as a part of a national integrity system as a way of understanding how they detect and prevent corruption and promote integrity. Integrity theory claims that an important part of the oversight of watchdogs occurs through judicial review of watchdog decisions by the courts. However, it fails to recognise the unique limitations when undertaking judicial review of watchdog decisions. This article submits that it is important to recognise these limitations to properly assess the effectiveness of a national integrity system and a fourth branch of government. The article explores the unique limitations of the court's ability to hold watchdogs to account and offers suggestions for managing these limitations. - Reproduced.
650			_aCorruption - Australia
650			_aCorruption
700			_aHaigh, Yvonne
773			_aAustralian Journal of Public Administration
909			_a112360
999			_c112355 _d112355