000			01415pab a2200169 454500
008			180718b2016 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aEng, Netra
245			_aDecentralization in Cambodia: new wine in old bottles
260			_c2016
300			_ap.250-262.
362			_aOct
520			_aThe usual arguments for decentralization by its advocates are that it can achieve accountability, transparency, participation and democracy. In reaching these goals, however, proponents of decentralization reform have articulated concerns about whether government officials have sufficient capacity to implement decentralization policies, particularly at local level. This article asserts that in Cambodia, where decentralization has unfolded gradually since its adoption some 15?years ago, lack of capacity is not the main problem. Decentralization is designed and implemented as part of the ruling political party's strategy to strengthen its grip at the sub-national level rather than as an exercise for improving accountability and democracy. Although decentralization is unlikely to lead to democratic gains, it does provide an opportunity for the rejuvenation of a patronage-based party in ways that could increase state capacity and improve development outcomes.
650			_aDecentralization - Cambodia
650			_aDecentralization
773			_aPublic Administration and Development
909			_a112945
999			_c112940 _d112940