000			02027pab a2200193 454500
008			180718b2017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRadhika Kumar
245			_aExploring the twin tracks of economic and IIPA governance reforms in the two states of Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh
260			_c2017
300			_ap.124-135.
362			_aMar
520			_aSecond-generation economic reforms in India, a feature of the mid-1990s, have also included subnational level reforms and restructuring. These reforms have also run the course of about 15 years with there being many temporal and spatial variations with regard to experiences of individual states. However, common to this reform experience are three features. First, that funding for these reforms has largely come from international financial institutions (IFIs), in particular, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB). Second, and drawing from the first, is the feature that the framework for reforms, development sectors covered as well as pace, prospects and outcome of reforms are determined by the same lending agencies. Third, reforms so initiated have invariably incorporated 'good governance' strategies. What is paradoxical then is that reform programmes which have been tailor-made to suit the economic specificities of a given state actually prescribe similar remedies for all. Increased economic autonomy of state governments in the post-liberalisation period has been limited to courting the IFIs for reform-linked loans. These loans come with concomitant conditionalities albeit made politically palatable by the terminology of good governance. The neoliberal model of development has found a pan-India appeal with there being little or no state-level variations in its adoption and implementation. - Reproduced.
650			_aInternational monetary systems
650			_aPublic administration
650			_aGood governance
650			_aEconomic reform
773			_aIndian Journal of Public Administration
909			_a114559
999			_c114553 _d114553