000			01533pab a2200157 454500
008			180718b2017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aSchneider, Aaron
245			_aSocial entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, collectivism and everything in between: prototypes and continuous dimensions
260			_c2017
300			_ap.421-431.
362			_aMay-Jun
520			_aThis article uses prototypes and continuous dimensions to place social entrepreneurship in relation to other organizational forms. This approach is more fruitful than classical attempts to stipulate essential characteristics and establish boundaries. A prototype and continuous dimension approach allows consideration of the way social entrepreneurship functions similarly to and differently from related concepts, such as traditional entrepreneurship, public social services, and collectivism. These categories can be distinguished according to the degree to which control over the way value is created, allocated, and distributed occurs socially or entrepreneurially. This approach offers the additional advantage of making the concept more precise, as subdimensions clarify the relationship to practices such as volunteerism and theories such as antidevelopment. By mapping the network of organizational forms in which social entrepreneurship can be located, we can focus on the viability and advisability of different ways of solving social problems. - Reproduced.
650			_aEntrepreneurs
773			_aPublic Administration Review
909			_a115106
999			_c115100 _d115100