000			01241pab a2200181 454500
008			180718b2017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHu, Chunyan
245			_aAccountability of public servants under dominant political settlements of China: effects, challenges, and issues
260			_c2017
300			_ap.240-255.
362			_aFeb
520			_aSome scholars think that accountability is attainable only under the electoral political system. However, it is argued that China could achieve some weak accountability even without general election system. How could this be achieved in China? The paper attempts to analyze this question with the following steps: first, it describes the specific accountability system by categorizing different approaches based on four dimensions, then focuses on the impacts that these approaches would have, which are based on finance, fairness and efficiency. It is concluded that under a dominant political settlement, only weak accountability exists in China, not real or strong accountability. - Reproduced.
650			_aAccountability - China
650			_aCivil service - China
650			_aCivil service
773			_aInternational Journal of Public Administration
909			_a115317
999			_c115311 _d115311