| 000 | 01163pab a2200169 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aJos Philip H. | ||
| 245 | _aCare, justice and public administration | ||
| 362 | _a25(3), Nov 93, p.373-92 | ||
| 520 | _aThis article examines the implications of recent debate regarding the nature of moral development and moral maturity for public sector ethics. The research of Carol Gilligan and others has suggested that the conventional account of moral maturity (on "ethic of justice") overlooks an alternative "ethic of care", allegedly found only among women. Although these differing models of moral maturity are not as conceptually or empirically distinct as they initially appeared, treating the care and justice perspectives as ideal types demonstrates that neither provides a defensible account of moral maturity. The authors explain how an exclusive reliance on either impartial rationality or care and concern for particular o | ||
| 650 | _a Employees Morale | ||
| 650 | _a Ethics | ||
| 650 | _aPublic Administration | ||
| 700 | _aHines Samuel M.,Jr. | ||
| 773 | _aAdministration and Society | ||
| 909 | _a26033 | ||
| 999 |
_c26033 _d26033 |
||