| 000 | 01082pab a2200169 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aLewis, Gregory B. | ||
| 245 | _aWill locality pay solve recruitment and retention problems in the federal civil service? | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 300 | _ap.371-80 | ||
| 362 | _aJul-Aug | ||
| 520 | _aThe authors examine the logic underlying locality pay by testing hypotheses about recruitment and retention on a 1 percent sample of federal personnel records for 1985 through 1989. They find evidence that interarea differences in private sector pay levels have a limited impact on federal turnover rates, entry levels, promotion chances, or grade levels. Therefore, the Federal Employee Pay Comparability Act of 1990 (FEPCA) replaces a uniform national salary schedule for white-collar workers with a system of locality pay, which will remunerate the same work more highly in San Francisco than in Santa Fe. | ||
| 650 | _aCivil service - U.S.A. | ||
| 700 | _aDurst, Samantha L. | ||
| 773 | _aPublic Administration Review | ||
| 909 | _a29160 | ||
| 999 |
_c29160 _d29160 |
||