| 000 | 01150pab a2200181 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aStanbury, William | ||
| 245 |
_aToward a political economy of government waste _bfirst step, definitions. |
||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 300 | _ap.418-27 | ||
| 362 | _aSep-Oct | ||
| 520 | _aWilliam Stanbury and Fred Thompson try to get beyond the mantra of waste, fraud, and abuse to deal seriously and constructively with the question of government waste. They provide a logical taxonomy of nine types of waste. To them a large proportion of the waste created by government is not included in the budget. Indeed, efforts to reduce budgetary waste often simply cause is to pop up elsewhere. A better understanding of the nature and varieties of waste is crucial to improving governmental performance and, ultimately, for the common defense, and promoting the general welfare - for present and future generations | ||
| 650 | _aWaste in government spending - United States | ||
| 650 | _aExpenditures, Public - United States | ||
| 700 | _aFred, Thompson | ||
| 773 | _aPublic Administration Review | ||
| 909 | _a29539 | ||
| 999 |
_c29539 _d29539 |
||