000			01255pab a2200181 454500
008			180718b1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRavi Kumar, T.
245			_aRastogi committee pay structure: disincentives reinforced
260			_c1997
300			_ap.1985-990
362			_a2 Aug
520			_aThe central paradox of policy on higher education since 1985 resides in the two opposed stipulations that policy-makers have wished to impose on the country's teachers: acquire degree after degree, eligibility after eligibility, if any career advancement is desired; simultaneously, learn to jettison all pretensions to thinking. It is in line with this mindset that the UGC Pay Review Committee, 1997, makes its recommendations. Its exertions in pursuit of the goal of drawing the `best talent' to teaching follow along three axes: (a) diminish teaching to a rung below bureaucrat, banker, executive and other educated services; (b) require spiralling eligibility, but take away every necessary input to excellence; and (c) regulate and regiment teachers into subservience. - Reproduced
650			_aEducation - India
650			_aEducational personnel
700			_aRaina, Badri
773			_aEconomic and Political Weekly
909			_a35137
999			_c35137 _d35137