000			01300pab a2200169 454500
008			180718b1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aFarmer, David John
245			_aLeopards in the temple: bureaucracy and the limits of the in-between
260			_c1997
300			_ap.507-28
362			_aNov
520			_aThis article examines a core problematic of bureaucracy. It suggests that the study of bureaucracy should make a clearer nonbureaucratic turn, focusing appropriately on what is described as the in-between. Analysis of structural limits of the in-between - hierarchy and lateralization - should center on the nonbureaucratic. Structure is not the central issue. Rather, structure is a surrogate for competing manifest and latent nonbureaucratic perspectives. Hierarchy is a surrogate not only for a rational order of justice but also for the feasibility of epistemological certainty. Lateralaization is a surrogate not only for human autonomy but also for skepticism and hesitation in knowing. The study of bureaucracy cannot be limited satisfactorily to "bureaucratic man." Rather, humans are irreducibly bio-psycho-spirituo-social-cultural beings. - Reproduced
650			_aBureaucracy
700			_aFarmer, Rosemary L.
773			_aAdministration and Society
909			_a37371
999			_c37371 _d37371