000			01067pab a2200157 454500
008			180718b1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aLeo, Christopher et al.
245			_aIs urban sprawl back on the political agenda?: local growth control, regional growth management, and politics
260			_c1998
300			_ap.179-211
362			_aNov
520			_aThe author argues that the apparent ineffectuality of efforts to control urban sprawl is in some part a result of a failure to distinguish between growth controls, which have a well-earned reputation as a thinly veiled form of NIMBYism and regional growth management (RGM), which involves the attempt to set out rules for development that are designed to preserve the livability, viability, and attractiveness of an urban area as a whole. This study surveys emerging political forces favoring RGM and notes signs that a new constellation of forces is emerging. It assesses the significance of this shift. - Reproduced
650			_aUrban development
773			_aUrban Affairs Review
909			_a40680
999			_c40680 _d40680