| 000 | 01118pab a2200181 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aVerma, Arvind | ||
| 245 | _aPolice accountability - Lessons from other countries | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 300 | _ap.788-801. | ||
| 362 | _aOct-Dec | ||
| 520 | _aAnalysing the scope of abuse (also dis-use) of police power, the author takes a closer and critical look on the existing three channels of police accountability in India - i.e., external (judicial review and Public Interest Litigation), internal (departmental inquiry) and other channels (supervision by District Magistrate, civilian bureaucratic control, etc.) - to expose their inadequacies. He then proceeds to briefly familiarise the readers with international (mostly western) practice in this regard with a critique thereon. He concludes by suggesting some lessons that India possibly can draw to its advantage from these models of police accountability. - Reproduced | ||
| 650 | _aAccountability | ||
| 650 | _aPolice | ||
| 773 | _aIndian Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 908 | _aN | ||
| 909 | _a41064 | ||
| 999 |
_c41064 _d41064 |
||