000			01432pab a2200181 454500
008			180718b1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHawkes, David
245			_aTwo models of contemporary public service wage determination in Australia
260			_c1999
300			_ap.110-11
362			_aJun
520			_aRather than taking Louise Thornthwaile and Robyn Hollander (AJPA June 1998) to task, I need to chide them gently for failing to acknowledge two other jurisdictions in Australia - the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory. Had they canvassed the Northern Territory's experience, they may well have concluded that there are in fact three models of public sector wage determination, not two. They may have also concluded that the Northern Territory's rather unique adaptation of the federal system under the Workplace Relations Act represents something more than an approach dictated by its relatively small size and that it arguably represents the best of both the other models. May I suggest that Thornthwaite and Hollander, or others, could usefully explore the question as to whether the approaches adopted by the various jurisdictions have produced worthwhile results for both employers and employees. - Reproduced
650			_aWages - Australia
650			_aCivil service - Australia
650			_aCivil service
773			_aAustralian Journal of Public Administration
909			_a41844
999			_c41844 _d41844