000			01418pab a2200157 454500
008			180718b1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aThompson, James R.
245			_aDevising administrative reform that works: the example of the reinvention lab program
260			_c1999
300			_ap.283-92
362			_aJul-Aug
520			_aA common conclusion among those who have studied administrative reform is that it rarely "works" as intended by its sponsors. This review of the National Performance Review's reinvention lab program, on the other hand, concludes that substantial success has been achieved. The explanation offered of this apparent anomaly focuses on one of the root questions about change and change processes - whether and to what extent large organizations and the behaviors of those therein can be shaped according to the intentions of one or more actors, or alternatively, whether change proceeds according to certain "natural processes" substantially immune to human interference. The interpretation placed on the findings is that the designers of the reinvention lab program have successfully devised a means of "amplifying" those processes in ways congruent with their reform objectives. Their success leads to basic questions about the construct of administrative reform itself. - Reproduced
650			_aAdministrative reform
773			_aPublic Administration Review
909			_a41934
999			_c41934 _d41934