000			01295pab a2200169 454500
008			180718b1999 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aDey, Bata K.
245			_aJudicial activism as constitutional panacea: An appraisal
260			_c1999
300			_ap.440-451.
362			_aJul-Sep
520			_aWith a backdrop of perspectives on Constitutional Provisions to facilitate conceptual clarity on judicial activism, the author embarks on a detailed appraisal of PIL embodying judicial activism as a much-needed Constitutional panacea, in its unfailing form of judicial assertiveness to secure justice, liberty, and equality for all. He analytically examines its nature, areas of operation, justification, necessity in view of variance in judges' competence to deliver justice, charges of its transgression in the domains of Legislature and Judiciary, its relationship with court's contempt provision, its objectives of realising social justice and enhancing poorman's access to justice as a matter of right, drawing vital support from its achievements. Thus, putting up a strong defence for judicial activism, he concludes alleying apprehensions of its critics. - Reproduced
650			_aJudiciary
773			_aIndian Journal of Public Administration
908			_aN
909			_a43485
999			_c43485 _d43485