| 000 | 00968pab a2200181 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aGeetha, M. | ||
| 245 | _aLegislature proposes, administration disposes: a case study | ||
| 260 | _c1998 | ||
| 300 | _ap.193-200 | ||
| 362 | _aApr-Jun | ||
| 520 | _aWhenever the issue of effective rehabilitation and resettlement is raised the administration pleads lack of legislative empowerment. The general belief is that things will work out all right once the laws have been amended and there are clear provisions for adequate rehabilitation. This argument cannot always be bought. Behind legal provisions there are sets of people who implement them, governed by their individual attitudes. It is quite often that the legal munificence is denied by insensitive implementation. - Reproduced | ||
| 650 | _aResettlement | ||
| 650 | _aCase studies | ||
| 650 | _aRehabilitation | ||
| 773 | _aAdministrator | ||
| 909 | _a43901 | ||
| 999 |
_c43901 _d43901 |
||