000			01491pab a2200193 454500
008			180718b2000 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRosenbloom, David H.
245			_aRetrofitting the administrative state to the constitution: congress and the judiciary's twentieth-century progress
260			_c2000
300			_ap.39-46
362			_aJan-Feb
520			_aOne of the twentieth century's "big questions" for United States government has been how best to retrofit, or integrate, the full-fledged federal administrative state into the constitutional scheme. The public administration orthodoxy initially advocated placing the executive branch almost entirely under presidential control; Congress and the federal judiciary responded otherwise. Congress decided to treat the agencies as its extensions for legislative functions and to supervise them more closely. The courts developed an elaborate framework for imposing constitutional rights, values, and reasoning on public administration practice. As the challenge of retrofitting continues into the twenty-first century, public administrators might profitably play a larger role in the constitutional discourse regarding the administrative state's place in constitutional government. - Reproduced
650			_aUnited States. Congress
650			_aJudiciary - United States
650			_aPublic administration - United States
650			_aPublic administration
773			_aPublic Administration Review
909			_a43989
999			_c43989 _d43989