000			01154pab a2200169 454500
008			180718b2000 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aZmolek, Mike
245			_aThe case for agrarian capitalism: a response to Albritton
260			_c2000
300			_ap.138-59
362			_aJul
520			_aAlbritton finds Brenner's designation `agrarian capitalism' inappropriate for early English agriculture, as the law of value and the commodification of labour are undeveloped. But Brenner is not theorising a `full-blown' capitalism. His theory traces a process of transition, by which new rules for social reproduction and a new capitalist logic unfolded gradually. Albritton's evidence, moreover, actually supports Brenner's thesis. Charges of class reductionism misconstrue Brenner's efforts to overcome the tendency to dichotomise society into political and economic spheres. Brenner's theory provides what the bourgeois paradigm does not: a logical explanation of how market dependency and capitalist classes emerged. - Reproduced
650			_aCapitalism
650			_aAgrarian structure
773			_aJournal of Peasant Studies
909			_a45568
999			_c45568 _d45568