| 000 | 01379nam a2200181Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 181130s2018 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 100 | _aIreland, Patrick R. | ||
| 245 |
_aThe limits of sending-state power: _bthe philippines, Sri Lanka, and female migrant domestic workers |
||
| 260 | _c2018 | ||
| 300 | _ap.322-337. | ||
| 504 | _dJun | ||
| 520 | _aSending states have taken various measures to protect their female nationals serving abroad as domestics. A most-similar case comparison is constructed between the Sri Lankan and Philippine states� defenses of �their� female migrant domestic workers (FMDWs), employing process tracing and relying on data from archival research, interviews, policies, and official statements. Existing explanations for sending-state actions stress dependence on remittances, receiving-country conditions, and the democratic incorporation of emigrants. Here, however, a stock of FMDWs with more highly valued human capital attributes, combined with a stronger civil society and greater gender equity, is shown to compel and enable the Philippine state to adopt a more assertive approach than its Sri Lankan counterpart in defending those migrants.� - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aDomestic workers | ||
| 650 | _aFemale domestic workers | ||
| 650 | _aMigration | ||
| 773 | _aInternational Political Science Review | ||
| 906 | _aMigration | ||
| 999 |
_c506681 _d506681 |
||