| 000 | 01403nam a2200193Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 181130s2018 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 100 | _aChristensen, Tom | ||
| 245 |
_aPost-new public management: _ba new administrative paradigm for China? |
||
| 260 | _c2018 | ||
| 300 | _ap.389-404. | ||
| 504 | _dJun | ||
| 520 | _aFrom three theoretical perspectives � instrumental, cultural and mythical � this article analyses the reasons for the worldwide emergence of post-New Public Management reforms and summarizes the typical features of those measures. In particular, it explores the link between post-New Public Management and public-sector reforms in China and argues that the ongoing reforms in China, including the super-ministry reform, the regulation of industry, the affordable housing policy, social and healthcare reforms, and the anti-corruption campaign, have shed light on various aspects of post-New Public Management measures. However, because China�s complex public administrative systems are more centralized than they are in many Western countries, it faces big challenges in deciding on and implementing reforms. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aNew public management - China | ||
| 650 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 650 | _aPublic administration - China | ||
| 700 | _aFan, Yongmao | ||
| 773 | _aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences | ||
| 906 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 999 |
_c506784 _d506784 |
||