| 000 | 01368nam a2200217Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 181130s2018 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 100 | _aDetkova, Polina | ||
| 245 |
_aCorruption, centralization and competition: _bevidence from Russian public procurement |
||
| 260 | _c2018 | ||
| 300 | _ap.414-434. | ||
| 504 | _dApr | ||
| 520 | _aThis paper estimates the impact of corruption on the incentives of procurers to maintain honest competition in tenders. Customers, who procure for themselves, and Agencies, who procure for the customers in their region are considered. Basing on a large dataset of open auctions conducted by Russian regional-level authorities in 2011, the analysis shows that in highly corrupt regions, Agencies fail to arrange competitive tenders and most of auctions have one bidder. Customers attract more bidders for large contracts, but rebates are usually low. Therefore, procurement centralization may reduce the corruption of Customers, but cannot solve the problem of low competition. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aCorruption | ||
| 650 | _aCorruption - Russia | ||
| 650 | _aGovernment purchasing | ||
| 650 | _aGovernment purchasing - Russia | ||
| 650 | _aPublic procurement | ||
| 700 | _aPodkolzina, Elena and Tkachenko, Andrey | ||
| 773 | _aInternational Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aGovernment purchasing - Russia | ||
| 999 |
_c506883 _d506883 |
||