| 000 | 01506nam a2200181Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 181130s2018 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 100 | _aClark, Cal | ||
| 245 | _aPolicy diffusion and performance-based budgeting | ||
| 260 | _c2018 | ||
| 300 | _ap.528-534. | ||
| 504 | _dMay | ||
| 520 | _aThis article applied the policy diffusion model as a theoretical framework for interpreting the international spread of performance-based budgeting, based upon 33 OECD case studies of countries that have implemented this reform. The data show that the historical development of performance-based budgeting was fairly consistent with the diffusion model. In particular, the adoption of performance budgeting took off during 1985�1995 and then accelerated over the following 15�years, and the primary innovators were a group of four English-speaking countries with comparatively�laissez-faire�economies (the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand). The case studies indicated that performance-based budgeting was generally part of a broader program of governmental reform, that executive agencies were more important than parliaments in managing it, that it became quite important in budget- and policy-making, and that implementing it faced a significant number of challenges. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aBudget | ||
| 650 | _aPerformance budgeting | ||
| 700 | _aMenifield, Charles E. and Stewart, LaShonda M. | ||
| 773 | _aInternational Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aBudget | ||
| 999 |
_c506891 _d506891 |
||