| 000 | 01265nam a2200169 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c507472 _d507472 |
||
| 008 | 190214b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aAli, Hamid E., _91742 |
||
| 245 |
_aState transitions form rigidity to fragility and failure: _bthe case of Middle East and North Africa |
||
| 260 | _c2018 | ||
| 300 | _ap.765-771. | ||
| 520 | _aThe taxonomy of the state’s effective governance capacity present in the literature is evolving around state fragility. However, this article argues that a state moves along the state transition curve, resulting in governance capacity variations over time. It begins as a fragile state, consolidating to becoming a vibrant state, only to embark, eventually, on a downward trajectory through phases of rigidity, decaying, and fragility, before becoming a failed state. About one-third of MENA (Middle East and North Africa) countries are either fragile or failed states. Only technological change and knowledge accumulation and diffusion can shift this curve upward, thereby increasing a state’s effective governance capacity. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 |
_aE governance _91743 |
||
| 650 |
_aGovernance _91744 |
||
| 773 | _aInternational Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 906 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cAR |
||