000			00946nam a2200157 4500
999			_c507758 _d507758
008			190223b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aFuller, Steve _92407
245			_aThe path taken and not taken in social epistemology
260			_c2018
300			_ap.530-536.
520			_aI respond to William Lynch’s critique of the sympathetic reading of my work provided by Remedios and Dusek in Knowing Humanity in the Social World: The Path of Steve Fuller’s Social Epistemology. Lynch harks back to my early works, which he sees as a promoting a ‘naturalism’ lacking in the later works. In response, I observe that my commitment to naturalism has always been ‘reflexive’, which has led me to break with conventional forms of naturalism, though sticking closely to the spirit of science. - Reproduced.
650			_aEpistemology _92408
773			_aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
906			_aEpistemology
942			_2ddc _cAR